Services

Technical reviews for systems that need to be trusted.

Each review is bounded, evidence-led and designed to leave a team with a clear defect map and an implementable next step.

Request a scoped review How the work is structured

Market Data Parity Review

For teams replacing a data source, normalizing a feed or reconciling two supposedly equivalent views of the same market.

Coverage, symbols, contracts, strikes and expirations
Timestamps, sessions, trade date, corrections and cancels
Multi-leg records and unmatched taxonomy
Downstream analytical impact and regression controls

View scope

Backtest & Research Integrity Review

For strategies and research pipelines where a promising result depends on honest historical availability and executable assumptions.

Point-in-time correctness and leakage
Commissions, spread, slippage, fills, rolls and expiration
Parameter sensitivity and reproducibility
Research-to-production consistency

View scope

Financial AI Evaluation Sprint

For AI-assisted research or analytics workflows that require repeatable, source-grounded answers instead of plausible prose.

Numerical accuracy, source grounding and citation fidelity
Temporal correctness, tables and instrument interpretation
Omissions, edge cases and repeated-run consistency
Prompt/model regression tests and human-review gates

View scope

Working principle

Follow-on work is optional and scoped.

Where a review identifies a bounded implementation need, follow-on support can cover a repair sprint, monitoring design or fractional research-infrastructure work. It is never assumed, bundled or hidden.